Received: from rmx11.iname.net (rmx11.iname.net [165.251.12.115]) by discover-net.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA01058 for ; Sun, 2 May 1999 21:16:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smv10.globecomm.net by rmx11.iname.net (8.9.1a/8.8.0) with SMTP id WAA00307 ; Sun, 2 May 1999 22:21:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rocky.orci.com (root@rocky.orci.com [204.144.173.1]) by smv10.globecomm.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1SMVSNAP) with ESMTP id WAA27297 for ; Sun, 2 May 1999 22:24:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [128.110.159.80] (remote.finearts.utah.edu [128.110.159.80]) by rocky.orci.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA23222 for ; Sun, 2 May 1999 20:23:57 -0600 (MDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1286424258==_ma============" X-Sender: jim@mail.orci.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <00db01be93e5$916baf60$14ca86d0@normette> References: <00db01be93e5$916baf60$14ca86d0@normette> Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 20:23:53 -0600 To: "Cheesy aka Patti" From: Jim Tipton Subject: Re: X-UIDL: 59d3ee517792a28a25472f6549ce1fd3 --============_-1286424258==_ma============ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" > >Jim >I don't think you ever answered my original question, but then again >my mail server has been acting weird so you may have answered and I >may not have gotten it. > >The question was: >Did you have to have permission from the Ramsey's to put JonBenet >and Elizabeth's web site pics on your website? > >Also was wondering about what you said were some "odd" things about >the contributor. > >Patti D >(alternate email address is >cheesy@switchboardmail.com ) > hi...i sent you this a few days ago: hey...sorry i took so long...i've been out of town (visiting graves!)...as for my body, you don't want it and my wife has already laid stake on it... as for the JonBenet photos...i have no idea if the person got permission from the family...in general, most of the photos on my pages aren't there with family permission, however, in the case where families have found their famous loved ones on my site, they seem happy about it... my exchange with the submitter of the Ramsey photos was 'a bit odd', however...nothing concretely bizarre, but just some strange comments here and there...what do you know about the person? who the hell is it? I'm not looking to get roped into a murder investigation, so just give me any info that won't get me subpoenaed in the future... thanks, jim i realize that doesn't explicity answer your question, but i thought it was obvious...no, i don't have permission from them to show the photo of the grave, but as far as i know, i don't need their permission, nor would i know the first thing about tracking them down (or the families of over 5,000 other people listed on my site!). Famous graves (Princess Di, Nicole Brown Simpson, JonBenet) are frequently shown in all media outlets in conjunction with stories...i'm pretty sure they don't all get permission from the family... anyway...the 'odd' things are slightly fuzzy in my head at this point...i just remember thinking, "there's an odd exchange"...i think she said she visited the grave almost daily, took her flowers, etc... -jim